Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Oct 29, 2019
  2. Oct 18, 2019
  3. Oct 03, 2019
  4. Aug 17, 2019
  5. Aug 15, 2019
  6. Jul 26, 2019
  7. Jul 25, 2019
  8. Jul 17, 2019
    • Richard van der Hoff's avatar
      Improve `Depends` specs in debian package. (#5675) · 1def2981
      Richard van der Hoff authored
      This is basically a contrived way of adding a `Recommends` on `libpq5`, to fix #5653.
      
      The way this is supposed to happen in debhelper is to run
      `dh_shlibdeps`, which in turn runs `dpkg-shlibdeps`, which spits things out
      into `debian/<package>.substvars` whence they can later be included by
      `control`.
      
      Previously, we had disabled `dh_shlibdeps`, mostly because `dpkg-shlibdeps`
      gets confused about PIL's interdependent objects, but that's not really the
      right thing to do and there is another way to work around that.
      
      Since we don't always use postgres, we don't necessarily want a hard Depends on
      libpq5, so I've actually ended up adding an explicit invocation of
      `dpkg-shlibdeps` for `psycopg2`.
      
      I've also updated the build-depends list for the package, which was missing a
      couple of entries.
      Unverified
      1def2981
  9. Jul 04, 2019
  10. Jul 03, 2019
  11. Jun 27, 2019
  12. Jun 11, 2019
  13. May 30, 2019
  14. May 22, 2019
  15. May 17, 2019
  16. May 15, 2019
  17. May 10, 2019
  18. May 03, 2019
  19. Apr 01, 2019
  20. Mar 07, 2019
  21. Mar 01, 2019
  22. Feb 27, 2019
  23. Feb 22, 2019
  24. Feb 14, 2019
  25. Feb 05, 2019
  26. Jan 24, 2019
  27. Jan 23, 2019
  28. Jan 22, 2019
  29. Jan 12, 2019
    • Richard van der Hoff's avatar
      moar plusses! · 4fd051f9
      Richard van der Hoff authored
      turns out that 0.34.1.1+1 comes before 0.34.1.1+bionic (etc).
      
      The version may only contain "~ 0-9 A-Z a-z + - ." (sorting in that order).
      
      Option 1: replace "+" with something that sorts after +. Options are "-" (but
      dpkg-source complains about that) or "." (but that would mean we couldn't
      distinguish packaging-only changes from real changes).
      
      Option 2: stick with + and just find something that sorts after 'xenial'. The
      only options there are "-", "." (same problems as before), "z", and "+".
      
      Hence, ++1. Sorry.
      4fd051f9
  30. Jan 11, 2019
  31. Jan 10, 2019
  32. Jan 09, 2019
Loading