- Jan 25, 2016
-
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
- Jan 22, 2016
-
-
David Baker authored
-
David Baker authored
-
David Baker authored
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
David Baker authored
-
- Jan 21, 2016
-
-
David Baker authored
-
- Jan 20, 2016
-
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
- Jan 18, 2016
-
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
- Jan 15, 2016
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
- Jan 14, 2016
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
Defaults ID to as_token if not specified. This will change when IDs are fully supported.
-
- Jan 13, 2016
-
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Jan 11, 2016
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
This tracks data about the entity which made the request. This is instead of passing around a tuple, which requires call-site modifications every time a new piece of optional context is passed around. I tried to introduce a User object. I gave up.
-
- Jan 07, 2016
-
-
Matthew Hodgson authored
-
- Jan 06, 2016
-
-
David Baker authored
-
- Jan 05, 2016
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
- Jan 04, 2016
-
-
David Baker authored
-
- Dec 23, 2015
-
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Dec 22, 2015
-
-
David Baker authored
-
- Dec 06, 2015
-
-
Oleg Girko authored
For some reason, one test imports Mock class from mock.mock rather than from mock. This change fixes this error. Signed-off-by:
Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
-
- Dec 01, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Nov 17, 2015
-
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
- Nov 12, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
Richard van der Hoff authored
Changes to m.room.power_levels events are supposed to be handled at a high priority; however a typo meant that the relevant bit of code was never executed, so they were handled just like any other state change - which meant that a bad person could cause room state changes by forking the graph from a point in history when they were allowed to do so.
-
- Nov 10, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Nov 09, 2015
-
-
Richard van der Hoff authored
... merely because I was trying to figure out how it worked, and couldn't.
-
- Nov 05, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
Squash-merge of PR #345 from daniel/anonymousevents
-
- Nov 04, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
This follows the same flows-based flow as regular registration, but as the only implemented flow has no requirements, it auto-succeeds. In the future, other flows (e.g. captcha) may be required, so clients should treat this like the regular registration flow choices.
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Nov 02, 2015
-
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
-
- Oct 30, 2015
-
-
Mark Haines authored
-
- Oct 26, 2015
-
-
Richard van der Hoff authored
POST /_matrix/client/api/v1/rooms//send/a.b.c gave a 500 error, because we assumed that rooms always had at least one character.
-
- Oct 20, 2015
-
-
Erik Johnston authored
-
Daniel Wagner-Hall authored
This is done by using the same /leave flow as you would use if you had already accepted the invite and wanted to leave.
-
- Oct 19, 2015
-
-
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans authored
-
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans authored
-
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans authored
-
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans authored
Another signing test vector using an 'm.room.message' with content, so that the implementation will have to redact it
-